The latest on DCM and grain-free food
- Ji Khalsa
- Mar 25, 2022
- 2 min read
The most recent paper on this topic was published March 17, 2022 in the journal "Frontiers in Animal Science."
It has the same conclusions the FDA report and several other papers have had (despite the misreading of that research by many): There is no credible link between grain-free food and dilated cardiomyopathy in dogs.
In a press release, one of the co-authors of the paper stated:
“Based on the data we received from veterinary cardiologists across the U.S., we did not observe a significant increase in DCM incidence rate over time, which included the recent period when grain-free pet food sales grew exponentially."
“The existing scientific literature indicates that nutritional factors can lead to the development of DCM, but we did not find a correlation in the DCM incidence rate to grain-free pet food sales.”
(Stephanie Clark, Ph.D., CVT, PAS, CFS, Dpl. ACAS, board-certified companion animal nutritionist and co-author of the paper)
Many of the prior studies were flawed and were based on "dirty" data. This study had much better design because it used only cases of DCM diagnosed by veterinary cardiologists. The study sample was also more than adequate: they looked at 68,000 total canine cardiology cases from veterinary cardiology referral hospitals, diagnosed between 2000 and 2019.
The average incidence rate of DCM was 3.9% (ranging from 2.53-5.65%). If grain-free food did in fact cause DCM, we would clearly see a higher incidence rate since such a high percentage of dogs eat grain free. But that was not at all reflected in the data.
The paper acknowledges that there is a trend of increasing DCM diagnoses, however, we need to look elsewhere for the cause as the evidence is repeatedly discrediting the grain-free food hypothesis.
Full paper here: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2022.846227/full





trang chủ sc88 mình ghé thử đúng kiểu tò mò thôi, tại thấy mọi người nói nhiều quá. Vừa vào cái là thấy giao diện khá sáng sủa, bố cục chia khối rõ nên mắt không phải đảo loạn lên tìm chỗ bấm. Mấy đoạn giới thiệu về kiểu “fair play minh bạch” họ để ngay phần đầu nên đọc lướt cũng nắm được họ muốn nhấn mạnh gì, không vòng vo. Mình bấm qua vài mục thì thấy chuyển trang ổn, thao tác mượt chứ không bị khựng khựng như mấy site nặng quảng cáo. Nói chung cảm giác thân thiện, chữ to vừa đủ, tiêu đề nổi nên không bị lẫn giữa các đoạn nội dung, nhất là…
98 win mình mới ghé thử vì thấy mấy đứa bạn nói suốt, chủ yếu tò mò giao diện thôi. Vào cái là thấy bố cục khá dễ chịu, kiểu chia khối rõ ràng nên lướt xuống không bị ngợp chữ. Mình để ý họ có nhắc tốc độ xử lý giao dịch tầm 1–3 phút, đọc thấy cũng đỡ lăn tăn vì ít nhất ghi cụ thể chứ không nói chung chung. Với lại có đoạn giải đáp kiểu “có lừa đảo không” nằm ngay trong mạch bài, không phải kéo tìm ở cuối hay giấu trong mấy trang phụ. Nói chung trải nghiệm đọc nhanh khá ổn, tiêu đề nổi bật nên mình scan một lượt là nắm…
A thoughtful and well-structured post that makes the topic easy to understand for readers at any level. I appreciate how you broke down key points without overcomplicating things. While reading, I was reminded of a similar discussion I came across on https://maydayhoustonlaw.com/ which also offered a useful angle on related concerns. Your content stands out for its clarity and balance, making it both informative and engaging for anyone exploring this subject.
Smoothly, this update provides relevant information in a concise and engaging format. The writing keeps the reader interested while delivering key points. It reminded me of a similar informational post I once saw on https://searenovation.com/ The clarity here makes the content both effective and easy to follow.
Interesting update shared in a concise and engaging way. The information is easy to follow and keeps the reader informed. I recently saw a similar update format on https://www.carsoup.com/ that worked just as effectively. Posts like this are great for maintaining audience interest.